Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2016-2018Notre Dame
Julian Love
CB • 5'11" • 189 lbs • Westchester, IL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Julian Love shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.1
Consistency
38.7
Season Value
27.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
1617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Julian Love, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Notre Dame. Julian Love shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 20 primary output with 36.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
35.1
Usage
4.3
Consistency
38.7
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 1. Michigan: 0. Ball State: 4. Vanderbilt: 4. Wake Forest: 1. Stanford: 1. Virginia Tech: 2. Pittsburgh: 1. Navy: 0. Northwestern: 2. Florida State: 1. USC: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 18.3. Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Ball State: 8 by 73.3. Vanderbilt: 3 by 52.5. Wake Forest: 3 by 22.5. Stanford: 2 by 18.3. Virginia Tech: 7 by 49.2. Pittsburgh: 3 by 22.5. Navy: 2 by 8.3. Northwestern: 6 by 45. Florida State: 9 by 47.5. USC: 12 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins1.5 · n=11
First Half1.8 · n=6 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · n=6 · -0.7 vs First Half
All Games1.5 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | @ Clemson | L 3-30 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | @ USC10+ tackles | W 24-17 | 12 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Florida State | W 42-13 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Northwestern | W 31-21 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Navy | W 44-22 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Pittsburgh | W 19-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/7 | @ Virginia Tech | W 45-23 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Stanford | W 38-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Wake Forest | W 56-27 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Vanderbilt | W 22-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Ball State | W 24-16 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Michigan | W 24-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 6 | 20.6 | 5.1 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 20 | 36.6 | 5.7 | 14 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 20 | 36.6 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Notre Dame | 18 | 35.1 | 4.3 | -2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 18 | 35.1 | 4.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#2
NC State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
#3
Vanderbilt
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#4
Army
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#5
Stanford
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
20 primary output · 36.6 efficiency · 5.7 usage
34.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Notre Dame
34.5
20 primary · 36.6 efficiency · 5.7 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
27.3
18 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8742
Nazareth Academy · La Grange Park, IL
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
160
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.