Player Stats

Reggie Walker College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
139
TFL
34
Sacks
17
QB hurries
17
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonKansas State1250.501-052.4
2016 Regular SeasonKansas State1233105.5-2052.4
2017 PostseasonKansas State10410--048.3
2017 Regular SeasonKansas State1032525-048.3
2018 Regular SeasonKansas State123512.57.552068.1
2019 PostseasonKansas State11411--048.1
2019 Regular SeasonKansas State11264161048.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Kansas State paired 27 primary output with 33 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 24.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Kansas State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

24.1

Usage

9.4

Consistency

38.3

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Navy: 2. Nicholls: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Oklahoma State: 2. TCU: 1.5. Oklahoma: 0.5. Kansas: 1. Texas: 1. West Virginia: 5. Texas Tech: 0. Iowa State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 4 by 36.7. Nicholls: 1 by 4.2. Mississippi State: 2 by 18.3. Oklahoma State: 4 by 36.7. TCU: 5 by 35.8. Oklahoma: 4 by 21.7. Kansas: 1 by 14.2. Texas: 4 by 26.7. West Virginia: 3 by 62.5. Texas Tech: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 7 · -1.9 vs Losses
Losses2.5 · Games = 4 · +1.9 vs Wins