Usage Score
3.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Michigan
Lavert Hill
DB • 5'11" • 182 lbs • Detroit, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Lavert Hill shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.8
Consistency
49.1
Season Value
30.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lavert Hill, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan. Lavert Hill shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan paired 13 primary output with 26 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
18.8
Usage
3.5
Consistency
49.1
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1. Army: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Rutgers: 1. Iowa: 3. Notre Dame: 2. Maryland: 1. Michigan State: 2. Indiana: 0. Ohio State: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 1 by 14.2. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 14.2. Army: 2 by 18.3. Wisconsin: 3 by 12.5. Rutgers: 1 by 14.2. Iowa: 4 by 46.7. Notre Dame: 0 by 20. Maryland: 0 by 10. Michigan State: 1 by 24.2. Indiana: 1 by 4.2. Ohio State: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=8 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=3 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.2 · n=6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=5 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Alabama | L 16-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State | L 27-56 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Indiana | W 39-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Michigan State | W 44-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Maryland | W 38-7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-14 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs IowaSplash game | W 10-3 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Rutgers | W 52-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-35 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Army | W 24-21 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 40-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 1 | 4.6 | 0.5 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 13 | 26 | 5.9 | 12 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 13 | 26 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 6 | 9.9 | 2.5 | -7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 6 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 14 | 18.8 | 3.5 | 8 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 14 | 18.8 | 3.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
#2
Florida
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.3 takeover score.
#3
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#4
Michigan State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#5
Hawai'i
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Michigan
13 primary output · 26 efficiency · 5.9 usage
36.1
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
36.1
13 primary · 26 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan
30.8
14 primary · 18.8 efficiency · 3.5 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9409
Martin Luther King · Detroit, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
57
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.