Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2016-2019Michigan
Josh Metellus
DB • 6'0" • 218 lbs • Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Josh Metellus shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.2
Consistency
35.1
Season Value
22.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan
1616171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Metellus, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan. Josh Metellus shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Michigan paired 11.5 primary output with 25.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
32.2
Usage
6.7
Consistency
35.1
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0.5. Middle Tennessee: 1. Army: 0. Wisconsin: 1. Rutgers: 0. Iowa: 1. Illinois: 0. Penn State: 0.5. Notre Dame: 2. Maryland: 3. Michigan State: 0. Indiana: 2. Ohio State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 11 by 50.8. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 22.5. Army: 5 by 20.8. Wisconsin: 8 by 43.3. Rutgers: 4 by 16.7. Iowa: 6 by 35. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Penn State: 5 by 25.8. Notre Dame: 4 by 36.7. Maryland: 9 by 67.5. Michigan State: 6 by 25. Indiana: 2 by 28.3. Ohio State: 8 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=9 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=4 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=7 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
67.5 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Alabama10+ tackles | L 16-35 | 11 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State | L 27-56 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Indiana | W 39-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Michigan State | W 44-10 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ MarylandSplash game | W 38-7 | 9 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Penn State | L 21-28 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Illinois | W 42-25 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Iowa | W 10-3 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Rutgers | W 52-0 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-35 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Army | W 24-21 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 40-21 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 2 | 16.5 | 4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 16.5 | 4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 4 | 19.4 | 3.5 | 2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 4 | 19.4 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 11.5 | 25.9 | 6.3 | 7.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 11.5 | 25.9 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 11 | 32.2 | 6.7 | -0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 11 | 32.2 | 6.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Maryland
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.4 takeover score.
#2
Nebraska
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#3
Rutgers
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#5
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Michigan
11.5 primary output · 25.9 efficiency · 6.3 usage
25.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
25.7
11.5 primary · 25.9 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan
22.8
11 primary · 32.2 efficiency · 6.7 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8572
Flanagan · Hollywood, FL
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
187
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.