Usage / Role
16%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2016-2018Michigan
DB • 5'11" • 198 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
David Long shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 10.8 disruption score.
Usage / Role
16%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
14
Developing production for a defensive back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
29
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Michigan
Snapshot
Player Story
David Long built his college career from 2016 through 2018 as a defensive back from Los Angeles, CA wearing No. 22, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of David Long's career was his defensive production:...
Read the storyNFL Draft
David Long, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Michigan. David Long shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 10.8 disruption score.
Stat Footprint

Featured Highlight
David Long Michigan Highlights
2018 · Michigan · Player Highlight
David Long college highlights at Michigan.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 11 | 1 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 51.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 11 | 19 | 2 | 0.5 | - | 4 | 0 | 51.1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 13 | 2 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 23.8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 13 | 15 | - | 0 | - | 5 | 0 | 23.8 |
Related Context
David Long played DB for Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, David Long recorded 37 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan paired 10.5 primary output with 17.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 10.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
10.8
Usage
1.7
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Western Michigan: 1. SMU: 0. Nebraska: 0. Northwestern: 0. Maryland: 0. Wisconsin: 2. Michigan State: 1. Penn State: 1. Rutgers: 0. Indiana: 0. Ohio State: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 12.5. Western Michigan: 2 by 18.3. SMU: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 1 by 4.2. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 1 by 24.2. Michigan State: 0 by 10. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Ohio State: 0 by 10
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
24.2 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Florida | L 15-41 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Ohio State | L 39-62 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Indiana | W 31-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Rutgers | W 42-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | W 42-7 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Michigan State | W 21-7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs WisconsinSplash game | W 38-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Maryland | W 42-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Northwestern | W 20-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nebraska | W 56-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs SMU | W 45-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-3 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
David Long built his college career from 2016 through 2018 as a defensive back from Los Angeles, CA wearing No. 22, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of David Long's career was his defensive production: 37 tackles, 2 tackles for loss, 0.5 sacks, and 3 interceptions across 24 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2017 with Michigan. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but David Long's production has multiple signals. With 24 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Michigan.
The arc is straightforward: David Long moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 10.5 | 17.1 | 3.1 | 10.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 10.5 | 17.1 | 3.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 6 | 10.8 | 1.7 | -4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 6 | 10.8 | 1.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Maryland
Week 11 · W 35-10 · Conference game
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Havoc Plays
65.3 takeover
2 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.
#2
@ Indiana
Week 7 · W 27-20 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
57.8 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#3
vs Penn State
Week 10 · W 42-7 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
46.4 takeover
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#4
vs Air Force
Week 3 · W 29-13
1
Havoc Plays
46.1 takeover
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.1 takeover score.
#5
vs Wisconsin
Week 7 · W 38-13 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
44.5 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Michigan
10.5 primary output · 17.1 efficiency · 3.1 usage
51.1
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
51.1
10.5 primary · 17.1 efficiency · 3.1 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan
23.8
6 primary · 10.8 efficiency · 1.7 usage
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.