Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019Michigan
Khaleke Hudson
LB • 6'0" • 220 lbs • Mckeesport, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Khaleke Hudson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
37.5
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
16.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khaleke Hudson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan. Khaleke Hudson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan paired 34.5 primary output with 48.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
37.5
Usage
9.1
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. Army: 0. Wisconsin: 2. Rutgers: 0. Iowa: 1. Illinois: 2. Penn State: 0. Notre Dame: 0.5. Maryland: 2. Michigan State: 0. Indiana: 0. Ohio State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 5 by 20.8. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 33.3. Army: 12 by 50. Wisconsin: 14 by 70. Rutgers: 7 by 29.2. Iowa: 11 by 55.8. Illinois: 6 by 45. Penn State: 6 by 25. Notre Dame: 5 by 25.8. Maryland: 8 by 53.3. Michigan State: 5 by 20.8. Indiana: 6 by 25. Ohio State: 8 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=9 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=4 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
70 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Alabama | L 16-35 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State | L 27-56 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Indiana | W 39-14 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Michigan State | W 44-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Maryland | W 38-7 | 8 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Penn State | L 21-28 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Illinois | W 42-25 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Iowa10+ tackles | W 10-3 | 11 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Rutgers | W 52-0 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Wisconsin10+ tackles | L 14-35 | 14 | 7 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Army10+ tackles | W 24-21 | 12 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 40-21 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 13.4 | 2.4 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 34.5 | 48.5 | 12.2 | 32.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 34.5 | 48.5 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 8 | 20.3 | 6.3 | -26.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 8 | 20.3 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 7.5 | 37.5 | 9.1 | -0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 7.5 | 37.5 | 9.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8.5
Primary metric
8.5 disruption/tackle impact with 78.1 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70.5 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.6 takeover score.
#5
Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Michigan
34.5 primary output · 48.5 efficiency · 12.2 usage
37.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
37.6
34.5 primary · 48.5 efficiency · 12.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan
16.8
7.5 primary · 37.5 efficiency · 9.1 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8844
McKeesport · McKeesport, PA
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
231
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.