Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2016-2018Michigan
Rashan Gary
DL • 6'5" • 283 lbs • Plainfield, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Rashan Gary shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.7
Consistency
29.8
Season Value
21.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan
1616171718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rashan Gary, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan. Rashan Gary shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.7 disruption score.
Rashan Gary played DL for Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Rashan Gary recorded 120 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan paired 18.5 primary output with 33.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 28.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
28.7
Usage
10.2
Consistency
29.8
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 0.5. Western Michigan: 2. SMU: 0. Nebraska: 3. Northwestern: 0. Penn State: 0. Rutgers: 0.5. Indiana: 3. Ohio State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 4 by 21.7. Western Michigan: 6 by 45. SMU: 3 by 12.5. Nebraska: 2 by 38.3. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Penn State: 2 by 8.3. Rutgers: 4 by 21.7. Indiana: 9 by 67.5. Ohio State: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.2 · Games = 7 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 2 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · Games = 5 · -0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · Games = 4 · +0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
67.5 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Ohio State | L 39-62 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Indiana | W 31-20 | 9 | 6 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Rutgers | W 42-7 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | W 42-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Northwestern | W 20-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs NebraskaSplash game | W 56-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs SMU | W 45-20 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-3 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 6 | 13 | 3.2 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 6 | 13 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 18.5 | 33.1 | 9.8 | 12.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 18.5 | 33.1 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 10 | 28.7 | 10.2 | -8.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 73.2 takeover score.
#2
Indiana
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#3
UCF
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#4
Indiana
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
#5
Nebraska
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Michigan
18.5 primary output · 33.1 efficiency · 9.8 usage
28.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
28.2
18.5 primary · 33.1 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
21.7
10 primary · 28.7 efficiency · 10.2 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
5
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2016 · Rating 1
Paramus Catholic · Paramus, NJ
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
120
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.