Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2016-2020Michigan
TE • 6'5" • 256 lbs • Plantation, FL, USA
Nick Eubanks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.5
Efficiency
66.1
Consistency
61.4
Season Value
46.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Eubanks, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Michigan. Nick Eubanks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Michigan paired 61 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
23.4
Efficiency
66.1
Usage
9.5
Consistency
61.4
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 5. Indiana: 22. Wisconsin: 41. Rutgers: 43. Penn State: 6
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 33.3. Indiana: 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 5 by 57.3. Penn State: 1 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 61 | 100 | 16.7 | 61 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 157 | 82.2 | 7.8 | 96 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 254 | 57.9 | 12.2 | 97 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 254 | 57.9 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 117 | 66.1 | 9.5 | -137 |
#1 Featured game
Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61
Primary metric
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northwestern
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
61 primary output · 100 efficiency · 16.7 usage
60.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
56.4
157 primary · 82.2 efficiency · 7.8 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan
55.3
254 primary · 57.9 efficiency · 12.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8893
American Heritage · Fort Lauderdale, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
589
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Nick Eubanks quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit