Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
California paired 513 primary output with 82.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 7 | 4 | 47 | 1 | 27.6 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 9 | 5 | 61 | 0 | 48.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 9 | 12 | 182 | 1 | 48.1 |
| 2019 Postseason | California | 6 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 69.4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | California | 6 | 14 | 243 | 2 | 69.4 |
| 2020 Regular Season | California | 4 | 18 | 225 | 2 | 56.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | California | 11 | 40 | 513 | 0 | 78.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
California paired 513 primary output with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, California.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
46.6
Efficiency
82.1
Usage
19.8
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 33. TCU: 49. Washington: 107. Washington State: 67. Oregon: 50. Colorado: 15. Oregon State: 31. Arizona: 56. Stanford: 41. UCLA: 42. USC: 22
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 2 by 100. TCU: 1 by 100. Washington: 8 by 89.2. Washington State: 3 by 100. Oregon: 6 by 55.6. Colorado: 1 by 100. Oregon State: 2 by 100. Arizona: 5 by 74.7. Stanford: 3 by 91.1. UCLA: 5 by 56. USC: 4 by 36.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.