Player Stats

Isaiah Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
98
TFL
4
Passes defended
24
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonFlorida International820-0-7257.3
2017 Regular SeasonFlorida International46-0-5037.5
2018 PostseasonFlorida International113-0-1050
2018 Regular SeasonFlorida International11251.50-4050
2019 PostseasonFlorida International122-0-1055.3
2019 Regular SeasonFlorida International12422.50-6055.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

Florida International paired 9 primary output with 21.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 23.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Florida International

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

23.2

Usage

4.3

Consistency

62.5

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 1. Tulane: 1. Western Kentucky: 1. New Hampshire: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Massachusetts: 2. Charlotte: 1. UTEP: 0. Old Dominion: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Miami: 1.5. Marshall: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 2 by 18.3. Tulane: 5 by 30.8. Western Kentucky: 4 by 26.7. New Hampshire: 3 by 22.5. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 37.5. Massachusetts: 0 by 20. Charlotte: 4 by 26.7. UTEP: 2 by 8.3. Old Dominion: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 12.5. Miami: 7 by 44.2. Marshall: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Wins