Usage Score
5.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Memphis
Jonathan Wilson
DL • 6'3" • 264 lbs • Port Sulphur, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jonathan Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
15.5
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
16.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis
161617181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Wilson, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis. Jonathan Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.5 disruption score.
Jonathan Wilson played DL for Memphis. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jonathan Wilson recorded 2 rushing yards, 100 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Memphis.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Memphis paired 12 primary output with 20.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Memphis
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
15.5
Usage
5.3
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 4. Ole Miss: 0. Unknown: 0. South Alabama: 2. Navy: 0. UL Monroe: 0. Tulsa: 1. SMU: 0. Houston: 0.5. Cincinnati: 2. Cincinnati: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 3 by 52.5. Ole Miss: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. South Alabama: 3 by 32.5. Navy: 1 by 4.2. UL Monroe: 1 by 4.2. Tulsa: 2 by 18.3. SMU: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 1 by 9.2. Cincinnati: 1 by 24.2. Cincinnati: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 9
First Half1 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games0.9 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Penn State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 39-53 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 29-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 34-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Houston | W 45-27 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs SMU | W 54-48 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa | W 42-41 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UL Monroe | W 52-33 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/27 | vs Navy | W 35-23 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Alabama | W 42-6 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Ole Miss | W 15-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620162017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Memphis | 12 | 20.4 | 9.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 12 | 20.4 | 9.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 7 | 14.7 | 4.5 | -5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Memphis | 15.5 | 25.5 | 7.9 | 8.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | Memphis | 9.5 | 15.5 | 5.3 | -6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Memphis | 9.5 | 15.5 | 5.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#2
Houston
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#3
Ole Miss
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#4
Tulsa
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#5
Temple
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Memphis
12 primary output · 20.4 efficiency · 9.6 usage
30.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Memphis
30.7
12 primary · 20.4 efficiency · 9.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Memphis
30.2
15.5 primary · 25.5 efficiency · 7.9 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7633
South Plaquemines · Port Sulphur, LA
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
100
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.