Player Stats

Benny LeMay College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,847
Rushing yards
3,207
Receiving yards
640
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonCharlotte620317528036.4
2017 Regular SeasonCharlotte1282073288456.8
2018 Regular SeasonCharlotte121,5101,2282821180
2019 PostseasonCharlotte1145450079.5
2019 Regular SeasonCharlotte111,2691,0272421379.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Charlotte paired 1,510 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 59.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Charlotte

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

119.5

Efficiency

59.4

Usage

35.8

Consistency

71.7

Best Game by takeover score

Florida International

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 45. Gardner-Webb: 122. App State: 152. Massachusetts: 130. Clemson: 88. Florida Atlantic: 48. Florida International: 234. Western Kentucky: 97. North Texas: 193. Marshall: 100. Old Dominion: 105

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 13 by 36.1. Gardner-Webb: 17 by 76.8. App State: 17 by 87.3. Massachusetts: 18 by 74.2. Clemson: 20 by 46.5. Florida Atlantic: 13 by 41.5. Florida International: 25 by 81.9. Western Kentucky: 18 by 41.2. North Texas: 32 by 57.4. Marshall: 21 by 49.6. Old Dominion: 18 by 60.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins130 · Games = 5 · +19.3 vs Losses
Losses110.7 · Games = 6 · -19.3 vs Wins