Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2016-2019Penn State
Blake Gillikin
P • 6'2" • 196 lbs • Smyrna, GA, USA
Impact contributor
Blake Gillikin shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Penn State
1616171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Gillikin, P. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Penn State. Blake Gillikin shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Blake Gillikin played P for Penn State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Blake Gillikin recorded -10 rushing yards and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Penn State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Penn State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Penn State
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 0. Unknown: 0. Buffalo: 0. Pittsburgh: 0. Maryland: 0. Purdue: 0. Iowa: 0. Michigan: 0. Michigan State: 0. Minnesota: 0. Indiana: 0. Ohio State: 0. Rutgers: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 10 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
— vs Memphis
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Memphis | W 53-39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rutgers | W 27-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Ohio State | L 17-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Indiana | W 34-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Minnesota | L 26-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Michigan State | W 28-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Michigan | W 28-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Iowa | W 17-12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Purdue | W 35-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Maryland | W 59-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Pittsburgh | W 17-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Buffalo | W 45-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0
Primary metric
0 primary-metric impact.
#2
Wisconsin
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
Michigan State
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Rutgers
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Indiana
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Penn State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2016 Regular Season · Penn State
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Penn State
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8533
Karns · Knoxville, TN
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.