Player Stats

Shaka Toney College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
112
TFL
29
Sacks
20.5
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonPenn State9186.54--035
2018 PostseasonPenn State101-01-048.6
2018 Regular SeasonPenn State10227522048.6
2019 PostseasonPenn State132-0-1058.9
2019 Regular SeasonPenn State133886.55-058.9
2020 Regular SeasonPenn State8317.5521063.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Penn State paired 15.5 primary output with 35.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 35.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Penn State

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1.9

Efficiency

35.5

Usage

11.8

Consistency

42.9

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 5. Ohio State: 0. Nebraska: 0.5. Iowa: 5. Michigan: 2. Rutgers: 0. Michigan State: 1. Illinois: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 7 by 79.2. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 4 by 21.7. Iowa: 5 by 70.8. Michigan: 1 by 24.2. Rutgers: 2 by 8.3. Michigan State: 5 by 30.8. Illinois: 6 by 45

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 4 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses2.6 · Games = 4 · +1.4 vs Wins