Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Stanford
Andrew Pryts
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Hermitage, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Andrew Pryts shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.7
Consistency
5.6
Season Value
10.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Stanford
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Pryts, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Stanford. Andrew Pryts shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Andrew Pryts played LB for Stanford. Across 4 tracked seasons, Andrew Pryts recorded 77 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Stanford.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Stanford paired 0 primary output with 5.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Stanford
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
26.7
Usage
6
Consistency
5.6
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 1. USC: 0. UCF: 0. Oregon: 0. Oregon State: 0. Washington: 0. UCLA: 0. Arizona: 1. Colorado: 0. Washington State: 0. California: 0. Notre Dame: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 5 by 30.8. USC: 7 by 29.2. UCF: 2 by 8.3. Oregon: 8 by 33.3. Oregon State: 6 by 25. Washington: 3 by 12.5. UCLA: 6 by 25. Arizona: 8 by 43.3. Colorado: 7 by 29.2. Washington State: 5 by 20.8. California: 10 by 41.7. Notre Dame: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 4 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 8 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
43.3 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Notre Dame | L 24-45 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs California10+ tackles | L 20-24 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Washington State | L 22-49 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Colorado | L 13-16 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Arizona | W 41-31 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/18 | vs UCLA | L 16-34 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs Washington | W 23-13 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Oregon State | W 31-28 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Oregon | L 6-21 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ UCF | L 27-45 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | @ USC | L 20-45 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Northwestern | W 17-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | 5.2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Stanford | 2 | 26.7 | 6 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#2
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#3
California
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 17.2 takeover score.
#4
Oregon
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 13.4 takeover score.
#5
Colorado
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 11.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Stanford
0 primary output · 5.2 efficiency · 1 usage
35.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Stanford
10.2
2 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Stanford
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8964
Hickory · Hermitage, PA
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
77
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.