Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Stanford paired 3,499 primary output with 62.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Postseason | Stanford | 11 | 205 | 212 | -7 | 3 | 52.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 11 | 1,460 | 1,361 | 99 | 14 | 52.1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Stanford | 13 | 86 | 105 | -19 | 0 | 66.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 13 | 3,413 | 3,414 | -1 | 29 | 66.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Stanford | 5 | 1,052 | 1,028 | 24 | 6 | 48.3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 6 | 1,218 | 1,283 | -65 | 6 | 44.1 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Stanford paired 3,499 primary output with 62.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 39.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Stanford, Mississippi State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Primary Metric / G
203
Efficiency
39.5
Usage
27.4
Consistency
41.3
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 585. Arkansas: 317. Kentucky: 228. Texas A&M: 72. Alabama: 16. Missouri: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 65 by 58.3. Arkansas: 63 by 51.7. Kentucky: 59 by 42.9. Texas A&M: 31 by 46.9. Alabama: 13 by 37.1. Missouri: 2 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.