Player Stats

Daniel Archibong College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
87
TFL
9.5
Sacks
5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonTemple11-0--036.7
2017 PostseasonTemple10311-1040.8
2017 Regular SeasonTemple10171.51-2040.8
2018 PostseasonTemple13310--044.6
2018 Regular SeasonTemple131620.513044.6
2019 PostseasonTemple104-0--039.2
2019 Regular SeasonTemple10220.50.522039.2
2020 Regular SeasonTemple7213.521-057

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Temple paired 6.5 primary output with 21.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 21.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulane

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Temple

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

21.8

Usage

7.8

Consistency

54.7

Best Game by takeover score

Tulane

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Navy: 0. South Florida: 0. Memphis: 0. Tulane: 2. SMU: 1. UCF: 1.5. East Carolina: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 6 by 25. South Florida: 3 by 12.5. Memphis: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 2 by 28.3. SMU: 3 by 22.5. UCF: 4 by 31.7. East Carolina: 1 by 24.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 1 · -1.1 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 6 · +1.1 vs Wins