Usage Score
16.7
Player Dossier
2016-2021Ole Miss
Kenny Yeboah
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Allentown, PA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kenny Yeboah reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.8
Consistency
62.8
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Ole Miss
16171818192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Temple • Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenny Yeboah, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Kenny Yeboah reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kenny Yeboah played TE for Temple and Ole Miss. Across 6 tracked seasons, Kenny Yeboah recorded 1,063 receiving yards, 4 tackles, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2020 with Ole Miss.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 525 primary output with 86.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Temple, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
75
Efficiency
86.8
Usage
16.7
Consistency
62.8
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 91. Kentucky: 83. Alabama: 182. Auburn: 83. Vanderbilt: 32. South Carolina: 39. Mississippi State: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 5 by 100. Kentucky: 3 by 100. Alabama: 7 by 100. Auburn: 4 by 100. Vanderbilt: 3 by 71.1. South Carolina: 3 by 86.7. Mississippi State: 2 by 50
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins42.3 · Games = 4 · -76.4 vs Losses
Losses118.7 · Games = 3 · +76.4 vs Wins
First Half109.8 · Games = 4 · +81.1 vs Second Half
Second Half28.7 · Games = 3 · -81.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 59-42 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Vanderbilt2+ TD | W 54-21 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 2 | 14 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Auburn | L 28-35 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 60 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Alabama100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 48-63 | — | 7 | 182 | 26 | 26 | 2 | 68 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Kentucky | W 42-41 | — | 3 | 83 | 27.7 | 27.70 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Florida | L 35-51 | — | 5 | 91 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2016-2019
Opening stop
- 2
Ole Miss
2020-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
2016201720182018201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Temple | 15 | 100 | 5.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Temple | 136 | 53.8 | 6.8 | 121 |
| 2018 Postseason | Temple | 154 | 65.6 | 9.4 | 18 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Temple | 154 | 65.6 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Temple | 233 | 64.4 | 9.6 | 79 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 525 | 86.8 | 16.7 | 292 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | -525 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
182
Primary metric
182 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Maryland
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Ole Miss
525 primary output · 86.8 efficiency · 16.7 usage
66.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Temple
52.2
15 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Temple
39
154 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 9.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7969
Parkland · Allentown, PA
- Committed To
- Temple
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,063
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.