Player Stats

Isaiah Wright College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,557
Receptions
134
Touchdowns
25

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 PostseasonTemple1217029.7
2016 Regular SeasonTemple12874129.7
2017 PostseasonTemple13573178.1
2017 Regular SeasonTemple1341595878.1
2018 PostseasonTemple13-0049.7
2018 Regular SeasonTemple13333681049.7
2019 Regular SeasonTemple1246440564.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Temple paired 668 primary output with 86.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 68.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Temple

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

36.7

Efficiency

68.3

Usage

20

Consistency

55.4

Best Game by takeover score

East Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Bucknell: 61. Maryland: 58. Buffalo: 49. Georgia Tech: 33. East Carolina: 104. Memphis: 56. SMU: 19. UCF: 31. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 0. Cincinnati: 12. UConn: 17

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bucknell: 8 by 50.8. Maryland: 5 by 77.3. Buffalo: 7 by 46.7. Georgia Tech: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 9 by 77. Memphis: 6 by 62.2. SMU: 3 by 42.2. UCF: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 26.7. UConn: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins41.1 · Games = 8 · +13.4 vs Losses
Losses27.8 · Games = 4 · -13.4 vs Wins