Player Stats

Joel Dublanko College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
233
TFL
22
Sacks
7.5
QB hurries
13
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonCincinnati381.50--016.1
2018 Regular SeasonCincinnati1127-0--042
2019 PostseasonCincinnati122-0--018.7
2019 Regular SeasonCincinnati12323.51--018.7
2020 PostseasonCincinnati10311--053.2
2020 Regular SeasonCincinnati10484.505-053.2
2021 PostseasonCincinnati1470.50-1073.8
2021 Regular SeasonCincinnati14106115.58-073.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 27 primary output with 50.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 50.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

1.9

Efficiency

50.6

Usage

12.5

Consistency

44.6

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 1.5. Miami (OH): 3. Murray State: 3.5. Indiana: 1. Notre Dame: 1. Temple: 3. UCF: 0. Navy: 3. Tulane: 1. Tulsa: 1. South Florida: 1. SMU: 0. East Carolina: 3. Houston: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 44.2. Miami (OH): 6 by 55. Murray State: 8 by 68.3. Indiana: 6 by 35. Notre Dame: 6 by 35. Temple: 7 by 59.2. UCF: 10 by 41.7. Navy: 15 by 80. Tulane: 9 by 47.5. Tulsa: 17 by 60. South Florida: 1 by 14.2. SMU: 4 by 16.7. East Carolina: 10 by 71.7. Houston: 7 by 79.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.0 · Games = 13 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 1 · -0.5 vs Wins