Player Stats

Luke Anthony College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
1,421
Passing yards
1,479
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech91,4211,479-581766.6
2021 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech00000-
2022 Regular SeasonBaylor00000-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Louisiana Tech paired 1,421 primary output with 53.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 53.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisiana Tech, Baylor.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Loss with 219 yards of offense and 59.1 efficiency. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech

Games

9

Primary Metric / G

157.9

Efficiency

53.9

Usage

17

Consistency

74.7

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 140. Houston Christian: 325. BYU: 219. UTEP: 56. Marshall: 149. UTSA: 145. UAB: 148. North Texas: 101. TCU: 138

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 24 by 55.3. Houston Christian: 35 by 63.1. BYU: 38 by 59.1. UTEP: 26 by 47.6. Marshall: 33 by 54. UTSA: 38 by 51. UAB: 23 by 54.3. North Texas: 21 by 47.7. TCU: 31 by 53.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins154 · Games = 5 · -8.8 vs Losses
Losses162.8 · Games = 4 · +8.8 vs Wins