Usage Score
3.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Marshall
Chris Jackson
DB • 6'0" • 186 lbs • Tallahassee, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chris Jackson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.4
Consistency
60.6
Season Value
26.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Marshall
1617171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Marshall
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Jackson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Marshall. Chris Jackson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Marshall paired 16 primary output with 34.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 22.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Marshall
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
22.4
Usage
3.3
Consistency
60.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Ohio: 1. Cincinnati: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1. Old Dominion: 1. Western Kentucky: 0. Rice: 3. Louisiana Tech: 1. Charlotte: 1. Florida International: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Ohio: 4 by 26.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 30.8. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 18.3. Old Dominion: 1 by 14.2. Western Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 0 by 30. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 22.5. Charlotte: 2 by 18.3. Florida International: 3 by 42.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.5 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.6 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Florida International | W 30-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Charlotte | L 13-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 31-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Rice | W 20-7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Western Kentucky | W 26-23 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Old Dominion | W 31-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 13-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Cincinnati | L 14-52 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Ohio | W 33-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Marshall
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Marshall | 16.5 | 28 | 5.7 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Marshall | 16 | 34.9 | 6.1 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Marshall | 16 | 34.9 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Marshall | 16 | 33.8 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Marshall | 12 | 22.4 | 3.3 | -4 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.
#2
Old Dominion
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 62.6 takeover score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#5
Charlotte
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Marshall
16 primary output · 34.9 efficiency · 6.1 usage
30.1
#2
2017 Regular Season · Marshall
30.1
16 primary · 34.9 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Marshall
26.4
12 primary · 22.4 efficiency · 3.3 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
2
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7744
Florida A&M University Developmental Research Scho · Tallahassee, FL
- Committed To
- Marshall
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
187
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.