Player Stats

Adrian Killins Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,323
Rushing yards
2,459
Receiving yards
864
Touchdowns
35

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 PostseasonUCF13-4-84037.1
2016 Regular SeasonUCF13527333194837.1
2017 PostseasonUCF1331283063.4
2017 Regular SeasonUCF139287621661163.4
2018 PostseasonUCF13917-8072.2
2018 Regular SeasonUCF131,083698385872.2
2019 Regular SeasonUCF12749629120858.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

UCF paired 1,092 primary output with 57.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 65 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Florida

Win with 115 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · UCF

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

62.4

Efficiency

65

Usage

12.5

Consistency

65.7

Best Game by takeover score

South Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida A&M: 106. Florida Atlantic: 111. Stanford: 72. Pittsburgh: 46. UConn: 77. Cincinnati: 23. East Carolina: 2. Temple: 51. Houston: 26. Tulsa: 95. Tulane: 25. South Florida: 115

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida A&M: 14 by 78.9. Florida Atlantic: 10 by 71.9. Stanford: 12 by 59.4. Pittsburgh: 8 by 59.9. UConn: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 4 by 59.9. East Carolina: 1 by 20.8. Temple: 5 by 92.5. Houston: 9 by 30.1. Tulsa: 10 by 89.6. Tulane: 5 by 33.3. South Florida: 14 by 84.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins65 · Games = 9 · +10.3 vs Losses
Losses54.7 · Games = 3 · -10.3 vs Wins