Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Alabama
Raekwon Davis
DL • 6'7" • 312 lbs • Meridian, MS, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Raekwon Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.2
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
10.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Alabama
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Raekwon Davis, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Alabama. Raekwon Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Alabama paired 19.5 primary output with 37.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 19.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Alabama
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
19.2
Usage
5
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 0. Duke: 0. New Mexico State: 1. South Carolina: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Tennessee: 0.5. Arkansas: 0. LSU: 1. Mississippi State: 0. Auburn: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Duke: 6 by 25. New Mexico State: 6 by 35. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 8 by 33.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3. Tennessee: 3 by 17.5. Arkansas: 3 by 12.5. LSU: 3 by 22.5. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Auburn: 8 by 43.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.1 · n=10 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=2 · +0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · n=6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
43.3 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Michigan | W 35-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Auburn | L 45-48 | 8 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Mississippi State | W 38-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs LSU | L 41-46 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Arkansas | W 48-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Tennessee | W 35-13 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Texas A&M | W 47-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Ole Miss | W 59-31 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Southern Miss | W 49-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Carolina | W 47-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs New Mexico State | W 62-10 | 6 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Duke | W 42-3 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 2 | 9.2 | 3 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Alabama | 19.5 | 37.1 | 9.4 | 17.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 19.5 | 37.1 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Alabama | 7 | 21.4 | 5.6 | -12.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 7 | 21.4 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Alabama | 3.5 | 19.2 | 5 | -3.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 3.5 | 19.2 | 5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.2 takeover score.
#2
Arkansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#3
Auburn
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#4
Georgia
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#5
Missouri
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Alabama
19.5 primary output · 37.1 efficiency · 9.4 usage
35
#2
2017 Regular Season · Alabama
35
19.5 primary · 37.1 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Alabama
13.2
7 primary · 21.4 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9587
Meridian · Meridian, MS
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
175
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.