Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Alabama
DB • 6'0" • 191 lbs • Kentwood, LA, USA
Shyheim Carter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.3
Efficiency
23.7
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
28.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shyheim Carter, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Alabama. Shyheim Carter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Alabama paired 0 primary output with 9.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 23.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
23.7
Usage
4.3
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 1. Duke: 0. New Mexico State: 2. South Carolina: 1. Southern Miss: 1. Ole Miss: 0.5. Texas A&M: 2. Tennessee: 1. Arkansas: 0. LSU: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Unknown: 1
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 3 by 22.5. Duke: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico State: 1 by 24.2. South Carolina: 4 by 26.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 18.3. Ole Miss: 6 by 30. Texas A&M: 7 by 49.2. Tennessee: 5 by 30.8. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 5 by 20.8. Mississippi State: 7 by 39.2. Unknown: 0 by 10
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Michigan | W 35-16 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Mississippi State | W 38-7 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs LSU | L 41-46 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Arkansas | W 48-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Tennessee | W 35-13 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Texas A&M | W 47-28 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Ole Miss | W 59-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Southern Miss | W 49-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Carolina | W 47-23 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs New Mexico State | W 62-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Duke | W 42-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | 9.7 | 1.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 1 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Alabama | 14.5 | 25.7 | 5 | 13.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 14.5 | 25.7 | 5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Alabama | 10.5 | 23.7 | 4.3 | -4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 10.5 | 23.7 | 4.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.
#2
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#3
Georgia
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#4
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#5
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Alabama
0 primary output · 9.7 efficiency · 1.5 usage
37.1
#2
2019 Postseason · Alabama
28.8
10.5 primary · 23.7 efficiency · 4.3 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Alabama
28.8
10.5 primary · 23.7 efficiency · 4.3 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.965
Kentwood · Kentwood, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
100
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Shyheim Carter quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit