Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Western Kentucky paired 549 primary output with 48.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Adam Cofield College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 549
- Rushing yards
- 373
- Receiving yards
- 176
- Touchdowns
- 4
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 61 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 14 | 548 | 372 | 176 | 4 | 61 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
39.2
Efficiency
48.3
Usage
12.2
Consistency
60.9
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 1. UT Martin: 48. Army: 2. Indiana: 53. Michigan State: 48. UTSA: 77. Old Dominion: 67. Florida International: 99. Charlotte: 22. Middle Tennessee: 4. Rice: 28. Florida Atlantic: 10. Marshall: 32. UTSA: 58
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 2 by 8.3. UT Martin: 11 by 43.2. Army: 3 by 6.9. Indiana: 13 by 42. Michigan State: 9 by 53.5. UTSA: 10 by 77.2. Old Dominion: 11 by 67.3. Florida International: 17 by 55.1. Charlotte: 4 by 52.1. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 41.7. Rice: 4 by 62.5. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 13. Marshall: 6 by 53.5. UTSA: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins34.6 · Games = 9 · -13.0 vs Losses
Losses47.6 · Games = 5 · +13.0 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Adam Cofield
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.