Player Stats

Harrison Bryant College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,137
Receptions
148
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic6663036.4
2017 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic1032408561.4
2018 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic1245662464.2
2019 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic13651,004786.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Florida Atlantic paired 1,004 primary output with 91.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 91.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

77.2

Efficiency

91.4

Usage

24.1

Consistency

73.3

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 79. UCF: 51. Ball State: 80. Wagner: 39. Charlotte: 96. Middle Tennessee: 68. Marshall: 72. Old Dominion: 92. Western Kentucky: 74. Florida International: 57. UTSA: 182. Southern Miss: 75. UAB: 39

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 6 by 87.8. UCF: 4 by 85. Ball State: 3 by 100. Wagner: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 6 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 96. Old Dominion: 8 by 76.7. Western Kentucky: 6 by 82.2. Florida International: 4 by 95. UTSA: 10 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 100. UAB: 4 by 65

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins80.2 · Games = 10 · +12.9 vs Losses
Losses67.3 · Games = 3 · -12.9 vs Wins