Player Stats

Da'Von Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
114
TFL
6.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic00-0--0-
2017 PostseasonFlorida Atlantic2110--022.2
2017 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic21-0--022.2
2018 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic11360.5013028.5
2019 PostseasonFlorida Atlantic147-0--055.5
2019 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic146950-3055.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Florida Atlantic paired 8 primary output with 28.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Florida Atlantic

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

28.3

Usage

5.7

Consistency

45.8

Best Game by takeover score

Middle Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. SMU: 0. Ohio State: 1. UCF: 1. Ball State: 0. Wagner: 0. Charlotte: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1. Marshall: 0. Old Dominion: 2. Western Kentucky: 0. Florida International: 0. UTSA: 0. Southern Miss: 1. UAB: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 7 by 29.2. Ohio State: 8 by 43.3. UCF: 6 by 35. Ball State: 8 by 33.3. Wagner: 4 by 16.7. Charlotte: 6 by 35. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 43.3. Marshall: 4 by 16.7. Old Dominion: 3 by 32.5. Western Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Florida International: 4 by 16.7. UTSA: 5 by 20.8. Southern Miss: 3 by 22.5. UAB: 8 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 11 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · +0.1 vs Wins