Player Stats

Calif Gossett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
345
Receptions
26
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonLouisiana0-00-
2018 Regular SeasonLouisiana2343058.8
2019 PostseasonLouisiana9279054.8
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana91399054.8
2020 PostseasonLouisiana5114056.9
2020 Regular SeasonLouisiana57110156.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Louisiana paired 43 primary output with 88.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 84 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Louisiana

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

24.8

Efficiency

84

Usage

8.7

Consistency

44.8

Best Game by takeover score

Texas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 14. Texas State: 52. Arkansas State: 14. South Alabama: 32. UL Monroe: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 1 by 93.3. Texas State: 2 by 100. Arkansas State: 2 by 46.7. South Alabama: 2 by 100. UL Monroe: 1 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half26.7 · Games = 3 · +4.7 vs Second Half
Second Half22 · Games = 2 · -4.7 vs First Half