Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2016-2020Alabama
Miller Forristall
TE • 6'5" • 244 lbs • Cartersville, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Miller Forristall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.9
Consistency
69.7
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Alabama
16171819192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Miller Forristall, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Alabama. Miller Forristall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Alabama paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Alabama
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
25.3
Efficiency
71.9
Usage
9.1
Consistency
69.7
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 31. Missouri: 34. Texas A&M: 23. Ole Miss: 16. Georgia: 29. Tennessee: 25. Mississippi State: 14. Auburn: 9. Arkansas: 52. Florida: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 3 by 68.9. Missouri: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 2 by 76.7. Ole Miss: 2 by 53.3. Georgia: 3 by 64.4. Tennessee: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 93.3. Auburn: 1 by 60. Arkansas: 6 by 57.8. Florida: 3 by 44.4
Split Comparison
Wins25.3 · n=10
First Half26.6 · n=5 · +2.6 vs Second Half
Second Half24 · n=5 · -2.6 vs First Half
All Games25.3 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Notre Dame | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 12/20 | @ Florida | W 52-46 | — | 3 | 20 | 5.3 | 6.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 12/12 | @ Arkansas | W 52-3 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Auburn | W 42-13 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Mississippi State | W 41-0 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Tennessee | W 48-17 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Georgia | W 41-24 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Ole Miss | W 63-48 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Texas A&M | W 52-24 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Missouri | W 38-19 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 73 | 80.7 | 9.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 12 | 80 | 7.7 | -61 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | -12 |
| 2019 Postseason | Alabama | 167 | 63.2 | 8.9 | 167 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 167 | 63.2 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Alabama | 253 | 71.9 | 9.1 | 86 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Alabama | 253 | 71.9 | 9.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Duke
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado State
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Alabama
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2020 Postseason · Alabama
62.7
253 primary · 71.9 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Alabama
62.7
253 primary · 71.9 efficiency · 9.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8853
Cartersville · Cartersville, GA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
505
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.