Player Stats

Binjimen Victor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,340
Receptions
83
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 PostseasonOhio State3121045.7
2016 Regular SeasonOhio State3343145.7
2017 Regular SeasonOhio State923349762.1
2018 PostseasonOhio State9234064.7
2018 Regular SeasonOhio State919320464.7
2019 PostseasonOhio State12338076.8
2019 Regular SeasonOhio State1232535676.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Ohio State paired 573 primary output with 88.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 88.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

47.8

Efficiency

88.1

Usage

14.4

Consistency

71

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 38. Florida Atlantic: 65. Cincinnati: 69. Indiana: 66. Miami (OH): 42. Nebraska: 27. Michigan State: 79. Northwestern: 7. Maryland: 36. Rutgers: 68. Penn State: 21. Wisconsin: 55

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 3 by 84.4. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 92. Indiana: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 93.3. Nebraska: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 100. Northwestern: 1 by 46.7. Maryland: 3 by 80. Rutgers: 5 by 90.7. Penn State: 2 by 70. Wisconsin: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.6 · Games = 11 · +10.6 vs Losses
Losses38 · Games = 1 · -10.6 vs Wins