Usage Score
14
Player Dossier
2016-2019Ohio State
Austin Mack
WR • 6'2" • 215 lbs • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Austin Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.3
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
65.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State
161717181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Mack, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State. Austin Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Ohio State paired 361 primary output with 83.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
36.1
Efficiency
83.3
Usage
14
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 54. Florida Atlantic: 21. Cincinnati: 24. Indiana: 27. Nebraska: 66. Michigan State: 19. Northwestern: 50. Penn State: 27. Michigan: 39. Wisconsin: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 6 by 60. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 70. Cincinnati: 3 by 53.3. Indiana: 2 by 90. Nebraska: 3 by 100. Michigan State: 1 by 100. Northwestern: 4 by 83.3. Penn State: 2 by 90. Michigan: 3 by 86.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins34.1 · n=9
First Half38.4 · n=5 · +4.6 vs Second Half
Second Half33.8 · n=5 · -4.6 vs First Half
All Games36.1 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Clemson | L 23-29 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Wisconsin | W 34-21 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Michigan | W 56-27 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Penn State | W 28-17 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Northwestern | W 52-3 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Michigan State | W 34-10 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Nebraska | W 48-7 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Indiana | W 51-10 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 42-0 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 45-21 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 15 | 50 | 3.6 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 343 | 82.8 | 12.3 | 328 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 343 | 82.8 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 331 | 77.7 | 11.7 | -12 |
| 2019 Postseason | Ohio State | 361 | 83.3 | 14 | 30 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 361 | 83.3 | 14 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
TCU
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon State
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#5
USC
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Ohio State
361 primary output · 83.3 efficiency · 14 usage
65.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Ohio State
65.4
361 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Ohio State
62.9
343 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 12.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9649
Bishop Luers · Fort Wayne, IN
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,050
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.