Usage Score
15.7
Player Dossier
2015-2019Ohio State
Keandre Jones
LB • 6'3" • 220 lbs • Olney, MD, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Keandre Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
46.9
Consistency
69.4
Season Value
41.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Maryland
151617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ohio State • Maryland
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keandre Jones, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Maryland. Keandre Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Maryland paired 25.5 primary output with 46.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 46.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, Maryland.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Maryland
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.1
Efficiency
46.9
Usage
15.7
Consistency
69.4
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. Syracuse: 4. Temple: 1. Penn State: 1. Rutgers: 2.5. Purdue: 3. Indiana: 1.5. Minnesota: 1. Michigan: 3. Ohio State: 2. Nebraska: 2. Michigan State: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 46.7. Syracuse: 8 by 73.3. Temple: 3 by 22.5. Penn State: 3 by 22.5. Rutgers: 10 by 66.7. Purdue: 4 by 46.7. Indiana: 4 by 31.7. Minnesota: 3 by 22.5. Michigan: 6 by 55. Ohio State: 8 by 53.3. Nebraska: 10 by 61.7. Michigan State: 11 by 60.8
Split Comparison
Wins3.3 · n=2 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · n=9 · -1.5 vs Wins
First Half2.4 · n=6 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=6 · -0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Michigan State10+ tackles | L 16-19 | 11 | 7 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Nebraska10+ tackles · Splash game | L 7-54 | 10 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Ohio State | L 14-73 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Michigan | L 7-38 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Minnesota | L 10-52 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Indiana | L 28-34 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ PurdueSplash game | L 14-40 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Rutgers10+ tackles | W 48-7 | 10 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Penn State | L 0-59 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Temple | L 17-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Syracuse2+ sacks · Splash game | W 63-20 | 8 | 7 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2015-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Maryland
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
201520162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | 8.3 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1.5 | 9.7 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 2 | 12.4 | 3 | 0.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 2 | 12.4 | 3 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Maryland | 25.5 | 46.9 | 15.7 | 23.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 67.4 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
#3
Michigan
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#4
Rutgers
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#5
Purdue
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Maryland
25.5 primary output · 46.9 efficiency · 15.7 usage
41.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
36.6
0 primary · 8.3 efficiency · 1.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
6.2
2 primary · 12.4 efficiency · 3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9544
Our Lady of Good Counsel · Olney, MD
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
103
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.