Player Stats

Jonathon Cooper College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
74
TFL
14.5
Sacks
10
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonOhio State4611--015.3
2017 Regular SeasonOhio State915321-031.4
2018 PostseasonOhio State10310--056.9
2018 Regular SeasonOhio State102052.52-056.9
2019 Regular SeasonOhio State4611-1027.2
2020 PostseasonOhio State8411--054.3
2020 Regular SeasonOhio State8202.52.521054.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Ohio State paired 10.5 primary output with 20.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 25 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

25

Usage

8

Consistency

30

Best Game by takeover score

Northwestern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Clemson: 2. Nebraska: 0. Penn State: 1. Rutgers: 0. Indiana: 3. Michigan State: 0. Northwestern: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Clemson: 2 by 28.3. Nebraska: 2 by 8.3. Penn State: 5 by 30.8. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Indiana: 1 by 34.2. Michigan State: 3 by 12.5. Northwestern: 6 by 65

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 7 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -1.4 vs Wins