Player Stats

Elijah King College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,187
Receptions
79
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonTexas State927437263.7
2017 Regular SeasonTexas State1152750382.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Texas State paired 750 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 86.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · Texas State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

68.2

Efficiency

86.3

Usage

24.1

Consistency

64.1

Best Game by takeover score

Troy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston Christian: 85. App State: 112. UTSA: 18. Wyoming: 11. UL Monroe: 39. Louisiana: 59. Coastal Carolina: 56. New Mexico State: 129. Georgia State: 103. Arkansas State: 29. Troy: 109

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston Christian: 4 by 100. App State: 6 by 100. UTSA: 1 by 100. Wyoming: 2 by 36.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 86.7. Louisiana: 3 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 7 by 53.3. New Mexico State: 11 by 78.2. Georgia State: 7 by 98.1. Arkansas State: 2 by 96.7. Troy: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins70.5 · Games = 2 · +2.8 vs Losses
Losses67.7 · Games = 9 · -2.8 vs Wins