Usage / Role
58%
Regular defensive contributor
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTEP
DB • 5'11" • 195 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Justin Rogers shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Usage / Role
58%
Regular defensive contributor
Impact Production
60
Solid production for a defensive back
Reliability
60
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
71
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Justin Rogers built his college career from 2016 through 2019 as a defensive back from Los Angeles, CA wearing No. 13, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Justin Rogers' career was his defensive production:...
Read the storyJustin Rogers, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Justin Rogers shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 10 | 17 | - | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 49.6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 11 | 39 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 44.3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 52 | 1 | 0 | - | 6 | 0 | 40.4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 72 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 33.6 |
Related Context
Justin Rogers played DB for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Justin Rogers recorded 180 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 9 primary output with 16.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 28.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
28.3
Usage
6.1
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston Christian: 0. Texas Tech: 0. Nevada: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTSA: 1. Florida International: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. North Texas: 1. Charlotte: 0. UAB: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Rice: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston Christian: 10 by 41.7. Texas Tech: 5 by 20.8. Nevada: 7 by 29.2. Southern Miss: 6 by 25. UTSA: 2 by 18.3. Florida International: 3 by 12.5. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 43.3. North Texas: 9 by 47.5. Charlotte: 10 by 41.7. UAB: 3 by 12.5. New Mexico State: 4 by 16.7. Rice: 5 by 30.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rice | L 16-30 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ New Mexico State | L 35-44 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UAB | L 10-37 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Charlotte10+ tackles | L 21-28 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ North Texas | L 26-52 | 9 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Florida International | L 17-32 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs UTSA | L 16-26 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-31 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Nevada | L 21-37 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | @ Texas Tech | L 3-38 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Houston Christian10+ tackles | W 36-34 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Justin Rogers built his college career from 2016 through 2019 as a defensive back from Los Angeles, CA wearing No. 13, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Justin Rogers' career was his defensive production: 180 tackles, 4 tackles for loss, 6 interceptions, and 17 passes defended across 45 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2019 with UTEP. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Justin Rogers' production has multiple signals. With 45 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UTEP.
The arc is straightforward: Justin Rogers moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 9 | 16.1 | 2.2 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 8 | 22 | 6.1 | -1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 8 | 24.7 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 28.3 | 6.1 | -4 |
#1 Featured game
vs Louisiana Tech
Week 9 · L 21-42 · Conference game
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Havoc Plays
79.2 takeover
1 disruption/tackle impact with 79.2 takeover score.
#2
vs Rice
Week 14 · L 16-30 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
76.9 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 76.9 takeover score.
#3
vs UTSA
Week 9 · L 14-31 · Conference game
2.5
Havoc Plays
76.4 takeover
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 76.4 takeover score.
#4
@ North Texas
Week 10 · L 26-52 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
68.6 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 68.6 takeover score.
#5
@ Rice
Week 10 · W 34-26 · Conference game
3
Havoc Plays
66.4 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 66.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
9 primary output · 16.1 efficiency · 2.2 usage
49.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
44.3
8 primary · 22 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
40.4
8 primary · 24.7 efficiency · 4.1 usage
7
Impact games
6
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.