Usage Score
2.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTEP
Dylan Parsee
LB • 6'2" • 220 lbs • San Angelo, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dylan Parsee shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
14.4
Consistency
3.3
Season Value
6.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dylan Parsee, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Dylan Parsee shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.4 disruption score.
Dylan Parsee played LB for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Dylan Parsee recorded 81 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with UTEP.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 14.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
14.4
Usage
2.9
Consistency
3.3
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Southern Miss: 1.5. UTSA: 0. Florida International: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. North Texas: 0. Charlotte: 0. UAB: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Rice: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 19.2. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. Florida International: 4 by 16.7. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. North Texas: 4 by 16.7. Charlotte: 9 by 37.5. UAB: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico State: 4 by 16.7. Rice: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0.2 · Games = 9
First Half0.3 · Games = 5 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games0.1 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
37.5 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rice | L 16-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ New Mexico State | L 35-44 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UAB | L 10-37 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Charlotte | L 21-28 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ North Texas | L 26-52 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Florida International | L 17-32 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs UTSA | L 16-26 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-31 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | 16 | 4.3 | 2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 4.5 | 26.5 | 10 | 2.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 1.5 | 14.4 | 2.9 | -3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.7 takeover score.
#4
Western Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.6 takeover score.
#5
Southern Miss
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 41.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
34.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
20.6
4.5 primary · 26.5 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
8.7
2 primary · 16 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7619
Central · San Angelo, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
81
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.