Player Stats

Chris Henderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
93
TFL
11.5
Sacks
5.5
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama46-0-109.2
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama592.51.52-066.1
2018 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama33-0--012.3
2019 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama11230.501-012.7
2020 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama7194.513-067.3
2021 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama1133431-040.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

South Alabama paired 8.5 primary output with 23.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 19.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · South Alabama

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

19.8

Usage

4.8

Consistency

9.1

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 0. Bowling Green: 0.5. Louisiana: 0. Texas State: 2. Georgia Southern: 0.5. UL Monroe: 0. Arkansas State: 3. Troy: 0. App State: 0. Tennessee: 0. Coastal Carolina: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 4 by 16.7. Bowling Green: 5 by 25.8. Louisiana: 1 by 4.2. Texas State: 3 by 32.5. Georgia Southern: 4 by 21.7. UL Monroe: 4 by 16.7. Arkansas State: 2 by 38.3. Troy: 1 by 4.2. App State: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 3 by 12.5. Coastal Carolina: 5 by 40.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 4 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Wins