Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Troy paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Troy | 1 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 33.3 |
| 2017 Postseason | Troy | 7 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 33.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Troy | 7 | 11 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 33.2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Troy paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 10 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
10
Usage
1.6
Consistency
9.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 1. New Mexico State: 0. Georgia State: 0. Idaho: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0. Texas State: 1. Arkansas State: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 1 by 14.2. New Mexico State: 1 by 4.2. Georgia State: 2 by 8.3. Idaho: 1 by 4.2. Coastal Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Texas State: 5 by 30.8. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.