Usage Score
7.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Tulsa
Cooper Edmiston
LB • 6'3" • 241 lbs • Gatesville, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cooper Edmiston shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41 disruption score.
Efficiency
41
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
16.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa
1616171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cooper Edmiston, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa. Cooper Edmiston shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Tulsa paired 0 primary output with 10.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 41 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
41
Usage
7.9
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 0.5. San José State: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Wyoming: 0. SMU: 0. Navy: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Memphis: 0. Tulane: 0. UCF: 2. Houston: 2. East Carolina: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 8 by 38.3. San José State: 11 by 55.8. Oklahoma State: 6 by 25. Wyoming: 9 by 37.5. SMU: 10 by 41.7. Navy: 12 by 50. Cincinnati: 9 by 37.5. Memphis: 5 by 20.8. Tulane: 7 by 29.2. UCF: 9 by 57.5. Houston: 13 by 70. East Carolina: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=4 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=8 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · n=6 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
70 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ East Carolina | W 49-24 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Houston10+ tackles · Splash game | L 14-24 | 13 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UCF | W 34-31 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Tulane | L 26-38 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Memphis | L 41-42 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Cincinnati | L 13-24 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Navy10+ tackles | L 17-45 | 12 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMU10+ tackles | L 37-43 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Wyoming | W 24-21 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Oklahoma State | L 21-40 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | @ San José State10+ tackles | W 34-16 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Michigan State | L 7-28 | 8 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 0 | 10.7 | 1.9 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | 10.7 | 1.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 3 | 37.2 | 8 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 13 | 50.1 | 17.6 | 10 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 5.5 | 41 | 7.9 | -7.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5
Primary metric
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.9 takeover score.
#2
Houston
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62.9 takeover score.
#3
South Florida
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.1 takeover score.
#4
Houston
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.9 takeover score.
#5
UCF
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
0 primary output · 10.7 efficiency · 1.9 usage
37.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
37.5
0 primary · 10.7 efficiency · 1.9 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
37.1
13 primary · 50.1 efficiency · 17.6 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
2
Splash games
17
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7644
Gatesville · Gatesville, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
343
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.