Player Stats

Corey Taylor II College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,066
Rushing yards
2,006
Receiving yards
60
Touchdowns
26

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonTulsa4440111.7
2017 Regular SeasonTulsa3178179-1444.4
2018 Regular SeasonTulsa11891846451172.8
2019 Regular SeasonTulsa1247246111649.4
2020 PostseasonTulsa790855164
2020 Regular SeasonTulsa74314310364

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 891 primary output with 52 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulane

Win with 132 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Tulsa

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

74.4

Efficiency

45.9

Usage

26.6

Consistency

75.9

Best Game by takeover score

Tulane

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 90. Oklahoma State: 1. UCF: 60. South Florida: 67. Tulane: 132. Navy: 69. Cincinnati: 102

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 21 by 44.4. Oklahoma State: 3 by 3.5. UCF: 11 by 56.8. South Florida: 12 by 58.2. Tulane: 19 by 72.4. Navy: 19 by 37.8. Cincinnati: 22 by 48.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins82 · Games = 4 · +17.7 vs Losses
Losses64.3 · Games = 3 · -17.7 vs Wins