Usage Score
18.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Tulsa
Keenen Johnson
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Alto, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Keenen Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.9
Consistency
53.5
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
1616171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keenen Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa. Keenen Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Keenen Johnson played WR for Tulsa. Across 4 tracked seasons, Keenen Johnson recorded 31 passing yards, 14 rushing yards, and 1,830 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Tulsa.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 539 primary output with 66.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
47.3
Efficiency
72.9
Usage
18.3
Consistency
53.5
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 37. San José State: 18. Oklahoma State: 15. Wyoming: 95. SMU: 70. Navy: 19. Cincinnati: 30. Memphis: 34. Tulane: 60. UCF: 75. Houston: 83. East Carolina: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 100. San José State: 3 by 40. Oklahoma State: 2 by 50. Wyoming: 7 by 90.5. SMU: 4 by 100. Navy: 3 by 42.2. Cincinnati: 4 by 50. Memphis: 3 by 75.6. Tulane: 4 by 100. UCF: 6 by 83.3. Houston: 4 by 100. East Carolina: 5 by 42.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins55 · Games = 4 · +11.5 vs Losses
Losses43.5 · Games = 8 · -11.5 vs Wins
First Half42.3 · Games = 6 · -10 vs Second Half
Second Half52.3 · Games = 6 · +10 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ East Carolina | W 49-24 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Houston | L 14-24 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UCF | W 34-31 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Tulane | L 26-38 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Memphis | L 41-42 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Cincinnati | L 13-24 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Navy | L 17-45 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMU | L 37-43 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Wyoming | W 24-21 | — | 7 | 95 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Oklahoma State | L 21-40 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ San José State | W 34-16 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Michigan State | L 7-28 | — | 1 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 305 | 68 | 20.1 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 305 | 68 | 20.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 539 | 66.6 | 36.3 | 234 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 418 | 72.5 | 19.1 | -121 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 568 | 72.9 | 18.3 | 150 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131
Primary metric
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wyoming
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 90.5 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
539 primary output · 66.6 efficiency · 36.3 usage
64
#2
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
61
568 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 18.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
56.1
418 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 19.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8111
Alto · Alto, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,830
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.