Player Stats

J.J. Taylor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,747
Rushing yards
3,260
Receiving yards
487
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonArizona427726116237.5
2017 PostseasonArizona1322193059.6
2017 Regular SeasonArizona1387382746759.6
2018 Regular SeasonArizona121,5651,432133878.3
2019 Regular SeasonArizona111,010721289566.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Arizona paired 1,565 primary output with 56.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 52.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stanford

Loss with 160 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Arizona

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

91.8

Efficiency

52.2

Usage

28.1

Consistency

70

Best Game by takeover score

Stanford

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 80. Northern Arizona: 102. Texas Tech: 39. Colorado: 4. Washington: 126. USC: 93. Stanford: 160. Oregon State: 167. Oregon: 129. Utah: 43. Arizona State: 67

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 15 by 52.1. Northern Arizona: 10 by 92.5. Texas Tech: 11 by 36.9. Colorado: 1 by 41.7. Washington: 21 by 55.9. USC: 20 by 50.6. Stanford: 21 by 73.5. Oregon State: 28 by 48.1. Oregon: 23 by 50.6. Utah: 13 by 34.4. Arizona State: 17 by 37.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.3 · Games = 3 · -59.8 vs Losses
Losses108.1 · Games = 8 · +59.8 vs Wins