Usage Score
16.1
Player Dossier
2016-2022Arizona
Devaughn Cooper
WR • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Devaughn Cooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
42.7
Season Value
58.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Arizona
161718192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Arizona • UTEP • Syracuse
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devaughn Cooper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Arizona. Devaughn Cooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Arizona paired 368 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona, UTEP, Syracuse.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Syracuse
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
40.4
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
16.1
Consistency
42.7
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 114. Louisville: 60. UConn: 27. Purdue: 11. Virginia: 27. Unknown: 64. NC State: 13. Clemson: 27. Pittsburgh: 7. Florida State: 4. Wake Forest: 51. Boston College: 80
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 7 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 100. UConn: 3 by 60. Purdue: 1 by 73.3. Virginia: 2 by 90. Unknown: 4 by 100. NC State: 2 by 43.3. Clemson: 2 by 90. Pittsburgh: 1 by 46.7. Florida State: 1 by 26.7. Wake Forest: 2 by 100. Boston College: 7 by 76.2
Split Comparison
Wins36.3 · n=6 · -4.3 vs Losses
Losses40.6 · n=5 · +4.3 vs Wins
First Half50.5 · n=6 · +20.2 vs Second Half
Second Half30.3 · n=6 · -20.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Minnesota100 receiving yards | L 20-28 | — | 7 | 114 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/27 | @ Boston College | W 32-23 | — | 7 | 80 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Wake Forest | L 35-45 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Florida State | L 3-38 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Pittsburgh | L 9-19 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Clemson | L 21-27 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs NC State | W 24-9 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 22 |
| Fri 9/23 | vs Virginia | W 22-20 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Purdue | W 32-29 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ UConn | W 48-14 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Louisville | W 31-7 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona
2016-2021
Opening stop
- 2
UTEP
2019-2020
Peak year stop
- 3
Syracuse
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
201620172018201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 15 | 100 | 6.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 12 | 40 | 13.3 | -3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona | 368 | 83.9 | 11.5 | 356 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 147 | 87.4 | 24.3 | -221 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 136 | 68.3 | 10.3 | -11 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Syracuse | 199 | 63.5 | 19.3 | 63 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Arizona | 199 | 63.5 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Syracuse | 485 | 75.5 | 16.1 | 286 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Syracuse | 485 | 75.5 | 16.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Arizona
368 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 11.5 usage
63.8
#2
2022 Postseason · Syracuse
58.6
485 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Syracuse
58.6
485 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8581
The Bolles School · Yulee, FL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
3
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,362
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.