Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2017-2020Northern Illinois
TE • 6'3" • 250 lbs • Mchenry, IL, USA
Corey Lersch reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9
Efficiency
60
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
29.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Lersch, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Northern Illinois. Corey Lersch reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Corey Lersch played TE for Northern Illinois. Across 4 tracked seasons, Corey Lersch recorded 94 receiving yards, 12 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Northern Illinois.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Northern Illinois paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
5.8
Efficiency
60
Usage
9
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 26. Ohio: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Akron: 3. Central Michigan: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nebraska
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Northern Illinois
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 65 | 66.7 | 11.3 | 65 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 29 | 60 | 9 | -36 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | — | — | -29 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35
Primary metric
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#4
Florida State
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 23.3 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
3
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2018 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
61.2
65 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 11.3 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
29.6
29 primary · 60 efficiency · 9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7885
McHenry East · Mchenry, IL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
94
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.