Usage Score
3.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Navy
Jackson Pittman
DL • 6'3" • 300 lbs • Antioch, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jackson Pittman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
15.5
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
10.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Navy
16161717181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Navy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jackson Pittman, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Navy. Jackson Pittman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Navy paired 4.5 primary output with 16 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Navy
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
15.5
Usage
3.9
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 0. Unknown: 0.5. East Carolina: 0. Air Force: 0. Tulsa: 0. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 2. UConn: 0. SMU: 0. Houston: 0. Army: 2.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 2 by 13.3. East Carolina: 0 by 0. Air Force: 4 by 16.7. Tulsa: 1 by 4.2. South Florida: 7 by 29.2. Tulane: 5 by 40.8. UConn: 1 by 4.2. SMU: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 1 by 4.2. Army: 5 by 45.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 10
First Half0.1 · Games = 6 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs First Half
All Games0.5 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | @ Kansas State | W 20-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/14 | vs ArmySplash game | W 31-7 | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Houston | W 56-41 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs SMU | W 35-28 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UConn | W 56-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Tulane | W 41-38 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs South Florida | W 35-3 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Tulsa | W 45-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Air Force | W 34-25 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs East Carolina | W 42-10 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Navy | 1 | 8.6 | 2.5 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Navy | 1 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Navy | 4.5 | 16 | 4.6 | 3.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Navy | 4.5 | 16 | 4.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Navy | 4 | 15.5 | 5.8 | -0.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | Navy | 5 | 15.5 | 3.9 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Navy | 5 | 15.5 | 3.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#2
UCF
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
#4
Memphis
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46 takeover score.
#5
Tulane
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Navy
4.5 primary output · 16 efficiency · 4.6 usage
16.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Navy
16.2
4.5 primary · 16 efficiency · 4.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Navy
11.6
4 primary · 15.5 efficiency · 5.8 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7933
Brentwood Academy · Brentwood, TN
- Committed To
- Navy
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
94
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.