Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Memphis
Bryce Huff
DE • 6'3" • 255 lbs • Mobile, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Bryce Huff shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.8
Consistency
37
Season Value
31.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis
16161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryce Huff, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis. Bryce Huff shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Memphis paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Memphis
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
30.8
Usage
10.6
Consistency
37
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 1. Ole Miss: 3. Unknown: 0. South Alabama: 0.5. Navy: 0. UL Monroe: 0.5. Temple: 0. Tulane: 2. Tulsa: 3. SMU: 2. Houston: 2.5. South Florida: 1. Cincinnati: 5.5. Cincinnati: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 5 by 30.8. Ole Miss: 5 by 50.8. Unknown: 0 by 0. South Alabama: 2 by 13.3. Navy: 5 by 20.8. UL Monroe: 5 by 25.8. Temple: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 2 by 28.3. Tulsa: 6 by 55. SMU: 2 by 28.3. Houston: 4 by 41.7. South Florida: 1 by 14.2. Cincinnati: 8 by 83.3. Cincinnati: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=11 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=2 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · -1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half2.4 · n=7 · +1.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Penn State | L 39-53 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 29-24 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Cincinnati2+ sacks · Splash game | W 34-24 | 8 | 7 | — | 3.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ South Florida | W 49-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ HoustonSplash game | W 45-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs SMU | W 54-48 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa | W 42-41 | 6 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs TulaneSplash game | W 47-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Temple | L 28-30 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UL Monroe | W 52-33 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/27 | vs Navy | W 35-23 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Alabama | W 42-6 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Ole MissSplash game | W 15-10 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Memphis | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 8 | 17.1 | 4.8 | 8 |
| 2018 Postseason | Memphis | 24.5 | 29.5 | 10.1 | 16.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Memphis | 24.5 | 29.5 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Memphis | 22 | 30.8 | 10.6 | -2.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Memphis | 22 | 30.8 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 77.3 takeover score.
#2
Cincinnati
5.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 67.7 takeover score.
#3
SMU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#4
Georgia State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 45.6 takeover score.
#5
Tulane
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Memphis
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
35
#2
2016 Regular Season · Memphis
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Memphis
33.9
24.5 primary · 29.5 efficiency · 10.1 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
8
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7678
St. Paul's Episcopal · Mobile, AL
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
132
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.