Usage Score
13.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Eastern Michigan
Mathew Sexton
WR • 5'11" • 175 lbs • Clinton, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mathew Sexton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79
Consistency
74.6
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
1617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mathew Sexton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Mathew Sexton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 508 primary output with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
46.2
Efficiency
79
Usage
13.8
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 48. Kentucky: 54. Illinois: 54. Unknown: 16. Central Michigan: 56. Ball State: 41. Western Michigan: 40. Toledo: 29. Buffalo: 87. Akron: 76. Northern Illinois: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 80. Kentucky: 7 by 51.4. Illinois: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 74.7. Ball State: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 4 by 66.7. Toledo: 2 by 96.7. Buffalo: 3 by 100. Akron: 4 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins45 · n=5 · -8.4 vs Losses
Losses53.4 · n=5 · +8.4 vs Wins
First Half44.8 · n=6 · -3.0 vs Second Half
Second Half47.8 · n=5 · +3.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/20 | @ Northern Illinois | W 45-17 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Tue 11/12 | @ Akron | W 42-14 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Buffalo | L 14-43 | — | 3 | 87 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Toledo | L 34-37 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Western Michigan | W 34-27 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Ball State | L 23-29 | — | 1 | 41 | 15.7 | 41 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Central Michigan | L 16-42 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 16 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Illinois | W 34-31 | — | 1 | 54 | 29 | 54 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kentucky | L 17-38 | — | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Coastal Carolina | W 30-23 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 51 | 57.8 | 5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 357 | 75.6 | 10.5 | 306 |
| 2018 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 419 | 62.9 | 16.6 | 62 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 419 | 62.9 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 508 | 79 | 13.8 | 89 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wyoming
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
508 primary output · 79 efficiency · 13.8 usage
65.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
54.9
357 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
52.7
419 primary · 62.9 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7841
Clinton · Clinton, MI
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,335
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.