Usage / Role
22%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2016-2016Central Michigan
WR • 6'6" • Normal, IL, USA
Austin Stewart reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
22%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
46
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
39
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Austin Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan. Austin Stewart reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 3 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 50.2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 50.2 |
Related Context
Austin Stewart played WR for Central Michigan. Across 1 tracked season, Austin Stewart recorded 65 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 65 primary output with 52.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 52.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
21.7
Efficiency
52.8
Usage
8.3
Consistency
20.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 55. Virginia: 6. Miami (OH): 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 4 by 91.7. Virginia: 1 by 40. Miami (OH): 1 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Tulsa
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 65 | 52.8 | 8.3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 65 | 52.8 | 8.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Tulsa
Week 1 · L 10-55 · Postseason
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55
Receiving Yards
81.7 takeover
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#2
@ Virginia
Week 4 · L 35-49
6
Receiving Yards
21.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#3
@ Miami (OH)
Week 10 · L 17-37 · Conference game
4
Receiving Yards
16.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
65 primary output · 52.8 efficiency · 8.3 usage
50.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
50.2
65 primary · 52.8 efficiency · 8.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.