Usage Score
6.2
Player Dossier
2017-2021Central Michigan
Hunter Buczkowski
TE • 6'0" • 255 lbs • Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Hunter Buczkowski reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60
Consistency
63.9
Season Value
50.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Central Michigan
171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Buczkowski, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Hunter Buczkowski reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
7.2
Efficiency
60
Usage
6.2
Consistency
63.9
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 11. Unknown: 3. Ohio: 0. Western Michigan: 13. Kent State: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 1 by 73.3. Unknown: 1 by 20. Western Michigan: 1 by 86.7. Kent State: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins8.3 · n=4
First Half4.7 · n=3 · -6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half11 · n=2 · +6.3 vs First Half
All Games7.2 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs Western Michigan
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 9 | 30 | 8.7 | 9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | -9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 47 | 78.4 | 13.4 | 47 |
| 2021 Postseason | Central Michigan | 36 | 60 | 6.2 | -11 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 36 | 60 | 6.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30
Primary metric
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Washington State
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Central Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2020 Regular Season · Central Michigan
65.4
47 primary · 78.4 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Central Michigan
50.9
36 primary · 60 efficiency · 6.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7652
Mt. Pleasant · Mt. Pleasant, MI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
92
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.